CircleCI matrix builds for robust time zone-aware testing in Java

Software Engineer

Time zone logic is one of the most common sources of subtle, hard-to-reproduce bugs for software development teams. Particularly for global apps involving calendars, reminders, deadlines, or meeting schedulers, untangling time zones takes up a disproportionate amount of developer time and brainpower.
That means that time zone-awareness is crucial in any system that involves time, whether it’s back-end services, front-end interfaces, or databases. Systems that operate across multiple time zones often encounter issues like incorrect time comparisons or inconsistencies in how time is stored and displayed. If the time shown to users doesn’t match their local time zone, the user experience can quickly degrade.
Some typical time zone-related issues include:
- Events showing up on the wrong day.
- Deadlines being missed or triggered too early.
- Bugs that appear only when users are in certain parts of the world.
Ironically, many of these problems occur simply because developers test only in their local time zone and never know how their application behaves elsewhere.
This is where CircleCI can make a difference. In this post, I’ll explain how to use CircleCI’s build matrix to test your application across multiple time zones so you can catch those sneaky bugs before your users do.
Prerequisites
To follow along with this tutorial, you will need the following:
- Basic knowledge of Java language.
- A CircleCI account.
- A GitHub account.
- Understand the unit testing flow with JUnit.
- IntelliJ IDEA installed.
Why time zone handling is so complex
Source: Wikipedia – Time Zone
This image is a world time zone map. Each color on the map represents a different time zone across the globe. The map shows how the world is divided into regions where the same standard time is used. Countries and territories are color-coded based on their current standard time, which is typically aligned with longitudinal divisions. Time zones may differ due to political boundaries or daylight-saving time adjustments.
Handling dates and times with time zones, especially in Java, can be confusing due to the difference between local time and absolute time (instants in UTC). The unintuitive behavior of legacy APIs like java.util.Date
and SimpleDateFormat
, and offset changes during Daylight Saving Time (DST) also contribute to the confusion.
Time zones are dynamic
Here’s an important point: time zones are not static. A country’s government can change its daylight saving time (DST) rules at any time. These changes are tracked in the IANA Time Zone Database, which maintains a history of such updates dating back to 1970. The database also includes details like leap seconds and unique offsets—such as Asia/Kathmandu at UTC+05:45, which isn’t a typical round number.
Offset diversity
Many people think that time zones are only a few hours off UTC. In fact, some use half-hour or even quarter-hour offsets. For example, Newfoundland in Canada is on UTC−03:30, while parts of Australia are on UTC+09:30. This certainly complicates calculations and time conversions across time zones.
DST ambiguity
During DST changes, one-hour spans can overlap or even be skipped, so LocalDateTime.parse
can map to the wrong instant.
Why CircleCI is well-suited for testing time zone logic
CircleCI isn’t just a continuous integration (CI) platform; it’s a powerful automation engine that enables parallel testing across different environments. Some of the features making it perfect for testing applications under multiple time zone configurations include:
- Matrix builds: Run tests across time zones in parallel
- Real simulation with TZ
- High performance and scalability
1. Matrix builds: Run tests across time zones in parallel
CircleCI supports matrix builds, which let you run the same job multiple times with different parameters; in this case, time zones.
For example, you can test your app in:
- UTC
- Asia/Tokyo
- Asia/Jakarta
- Asia/Brunei
All of these tests run in parallel, not one after another, making the feedback loop fast and efficient.
workflows:
test-across-timezones:
jobs:
- test:
matrix:
parameters:
timezone: [UTC, Asia/Tokyo, Asia/Jakarta, Asia/Brunei]
2. Real simulation with TZ
By simply setting the TZ environment variable, you can simulate a system running in any time zone.
Without modifying your code, you can:
- Simulate running your application on a server in Tokyo, Jakarta, or Riyadh.
- Test logic that depends on
ZonedDateTime
,Instant
,Clock
, orLocalDateTime
.
3. High performance and scalability
Since matrix jobs run concurrently:
- Tests complete much faster.
- We can easily expand your test coverage by adding new time zones without increasing pipeline time linearly.
Time zone aware testing in Java
To make it clear how you will test this time zone problem, you need to create a simple example.
Note that the goal is not to build a flawless system, but rather to demonstrate the testing workflow using CircleCI as the main focus.
Sample case: Handling promo coupon expiration in different time zones
We’re going to build a service that handles coupon validation based on a specific expiration deadline. The main challenge is ensuring the validation logic works correctly for users across different time zones, such as Asia/Tokyo, Europe/London, and others.
To solve this, we’ll use ZonedDateTime
and Clock
, which allow us to write consistent and testable logic regardless of the user’s local time. For example, a coupon will be considered valid if it’s used before the deadline: April 16, 2025 at 23:59:59 in the UTC time zone.
The steps are:
- Create the project
- Create the
CouponService
class - Test
CouponService
1. Create the project
Set up a new Java project called CouponService using IntelliJ IDEA.
We’re creating this project with the following specifications:
- Project name: CouponService - suggesting we’ll be building a service to handle coupon/discount functionality for e-commerce or similar applications
- Version control: Initializing with Git repository - essential for modern collaborative development
- Build system: Gradle with Groovy DSL - the preferred build tool for Java projects offering flexibility and powerful dependency management
- JDK: Amazon Corretto 17 (version 17.0.14) - a production-ready OpenJDK distribution with long-term support, but you can use the one present in your system.
- Add sample code: Including sample code to jumpstart development
Since you are using Gradle, the project structure will be like this:
CouponService/
├── src/
│ ├── main/java/ # Main Source Code
│ ├── test/java/ # Unit test
├── build.gradle # Gradle Config
├── settings.gradle
2. Create the CouponService
class
In the main/java
directory, let’s create a simple CouponService class in Java — something that checks if a coupon is still valid based on the current time.
Here’s the full version of the CouponService
class. In this case the class is in main/java
directory:
import java.time.Clock;
import java.time.ZoneId;
import java.time.ZonedDateTime;
public class CouponService {
private final Clock clock;
private ZonedDateTime deadline;
private ZonedDateTime nowUtc;
public ZonedDateTime getNowUtc() {
return nowUtc;
}
public ZonedDateTime getDeadline() {
return deadline;
}
public CouponService(Clock clock) {
this.clock = clock;
}
public boolean isCouponValid() {
ZoneId zoneUtc = ZoneId.of("UTC");
this.deadline = ZonedDateTime.of(2025, 4, 16, 23, 59, 59, 0, zoneUtc);
this.nowUtc = ZonedDateTime.now(clock)
.withZoneSameInstant(zoneUtc);
return !nowUtc.isAfter(deadline);
}
}
Here’s the heart of it. This method checks if a coupon is still valid:
- Sets the time zone to UTC (universal time).
- Defines a hardcoded deadline for the coupon: April 16, 2025 at 11:59:59 PM UTC.
- Gets the current time, also in UTC, using the clock.
- Returns
true
if the current time is before or exactly at the deadline. If it’s after, the coupon has expired.
So, to sum it up: this class lets you check if a coupon is still valid based on a fixed deadline.
- Test
CouponService
Now that we’ve built the CouponService
, it’s time to test it and make sure it works correctly — especially when time zones come into play.
Name it CouponSystemZoneTest.java
and put it inside the src/test/java
directory.
import java.io.BufferedWriter;
import java.io.FileWriter;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.nio.file.Path;
import java.nio.file.Paths;
import java.time.Clock;
import java.time.Instant;
import java.time.LocalDateTime;
import java.time.ZoneId;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterAll;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeAll;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.TestInstance;
import org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest;
import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.CsvSource;
@TestInstance(TestInstance.Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)
public class CouponSystemZoneTest {
ZoneId systemZone = ZoneId.systemDefault();
static int testIndex = 1;
StringBuilder htmlTable = new StringBuilder();
@BeforeAll
void setupHtmlTable() {
htmlTable.append("<html><head><title>Coupon Timezone Report</title>")
.append("<style>")
.append("table { border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; }")
.append("th, td { border: 1px solid #ddd; padding: 8px; }")
.append("th { background-color: #f2f2f2; }")
.append("</style></head><body>\n");
htmlTable.append("<h2>Timezone: ").append(systemZone).append("</h2>\n");
htmlTable.append("<table>\n")
.append("<tr>")
.append("<th>#</th><th>Input Local Time</th><th>UTC Time</th><th>Deadline UTC</th><th>Valid?</th>")
.append("</tr>\n");
}
@ParameterizedTest(name = "[{index}] {0}")
@CsvSource({
"2025-04-15T00:00:00",
"2025-04-16T22:00:00",
"2025-04-17T00:59:59",
"2025-04-16T18:59:59",
"2025-04-17T00:00:01",
"2025-04-16T17:00:00",
"2025-04-17T02:00:00",
"2025-04-16T13:00:00"
})
void testCouponValidInSystemTimezone(String localDateTimeStr) {
LocalDateTime localDateTime = LocalDateTime.parse(localDateTimeStr);
Instant instant = localDateTime.atZone(systemZone).toInstant();
Clock fixedClock = Clock.fixed(instant, systemZone);
CouponService service = new CouponService(fixedClock);
boolean actualValid = service.isCouponValid();
htmlTable.append("<tr>")
.append("<td>").append(testIndex++).append("</td>")
.append("<td>").append(localDateTimeStr).append("</td>")
.append("<td>").append(service.getNowUtc()).append("</td>")
.append("<td>").append(service.getDeadline()).append("</td>")
.append("<td>").append(actualValid ? "✅ true" : "❌ false").append("</td>")
.append("</tr>\n");
}
@AfterAll
void writeHtmlFile() {
htmlTable.append("</table></body></html>");
Path junitHtmlDir = Paths.get("build", "reports", "tests", "test");
Path outputPath = junitHtmlDir.resolve("coupon-timezone-report.html");
try (BufferedWriter writer = new BufferedWriter(new FileWriter(outputPath.toFile()))) {
writer.write(htmlTable.toString());
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
System.out.println("✅ HTML report saved to: " + outputPath.toAbsolutePath());
}
}
The CouponSystemZoneTest
class uses JUnit 5 parameterized tests to simulate various LocalDateTime
inputs. Using Clock.fixed(...)
, freezes the time at a specific point, allowing you to consistently test whether a coupon is considered valid according to the logic in CouponService
.
Begin in @BeforeAll
by building an HTML structure that will serve as a test report. Each test case, defined in the @CsvSource
, runs with a different timestamp input. During each test run, convert the local datetime into a fixed Clock
, run the coupon validation, and record the result.
After all tests are executed, use @AfterAll
to write the results into an HTML file. This provides a clear, visual summary of which coupon times are valid or invalid under the current system time zone. The resulting report file is saved with the file name coupon-timezone-report.html
.
This not only verifies time-sensitive logic, but also generates a useful report to analyze the results more intuitively.
Set up CircleCI
Firstly, start by pushing your project to GitHub. Then, integrate it with CircleCI. During the setup, CircleCI will automatically create a new branch called circleci-project-setup
, which includes an initial configuration file located at .circleci/config.yml
.
The circleci-project-setup
branch is generated by CircleCI to help initialize the pipeline configuration without directly modifying your main branch (main
or master
). This approach gives you the opportunity to review and customize the configuration before applying it to your primary development workflow.
If you open .circleci/config.yml
, by default the contents are like this:
# This config was automatically generated from your source code
# Stacks detected: deps:java:.,tool:gradle:
version: 2.1
jobs:
test-java:
docker:
- image: cimg/openjdk:17.0
steps:
- checkout
- run:
name: Calculate cache key
command: |-
find . -name 'pom.xml' -o -name 'gradlew*' -o -name '*.gradle*' | \
sort | xargs cat > /tmp/CIRCLECI_CACHE_KEY
- restore_cache:
key: cache-{{ checksum "/tmp/CIRCLECI_CACHE_KEY" }}
- run:
command: ./gradlew check
- store_test_results:
path: build/test-results
- save_cache:
key: cache-{{ checksum "/tmp/CIRCLECI_CACHE_KEY" }}
paths:
- ~/.gradle/caches
- store_artifacts:
path: build/reports
deploy:
# This is an example deploy job, not actually used by the workflow
docker:
- image: cimg/base:stable
steps:
# Replace this with steps to deploy to users
- run:
name: deploy
command: "#e.g. ./deploy.sh"
workflows:
build-and-test:
jobs:
- test-java
# - deploy:
# requires:
# - test-java
This workflow has two jobs by default, but only one is active.
-
test-java runs Java tests with Gradle in a Docker container (OpenJDK 17), uses caching, and stores test results and reports.
-
deploy is a placeholder for deployment; it’s currently not used (commented out).
Configuring matrix builds
We can builds more flexible and powerful by introducing a matrix build. Let’s walk through how to convert a standard CircleCI config into one that tests across multiple time zones, using matrix parameters.
- 1. Add a parameter to your job
To simplify naming and make it more generic (especially since you might reuse this for different kinds of Java testing), we’ll rename it from test-java
to just test
.
Then, by turning your test
job into a parameterized job. Specifically, we’ll add a timezone
parameter that you can later feed different values into.
jobs:
test:
parameters:
timezone:
type: string
docker:
- image: cimg/openjdk:17.0
environment:
TZ: << parameters.timezone >>
steps:
- checkout
- run:
name: Run Tests in << parameters.timezone >>
command: ./gradlew test --info
We’re injecting the timezone
into the environment variable TZ
, which many systems (and Java itself) use to determine the current time zone.
- 2. Define a matrix workflow
Now for the magic. In your workflows
section, define a matrix of time zones you want to test against:
workflows:
test-across-timezones:
jobs:
- test:
matrix:
parameters:
timezone: [Asia/Singapore, Asia/Riyadh, Asia/Tokyo, Europe/London, Europe/Paris, America/New_York]
This tells CircleCI to run the test
job once for each time zone, in parallel if possible. It’s a concise, scalable way to run the same logic across many configurations.
Here is the full version:
# This config was automatically generated from your source code
# Stacks detected: deps:java:.,tool:gradle:
version: 2.1
jobs:
test:
parameters:
timezone:
type: string
docker:
- image: cimg/openjdk:17.0
environment:
TZ: << parameters.timezone >>
steps:
- checkout
- run:
name: Calculate cache key
command: |-
find . -name 'pom.xml' -o -name 'gradlew*' -o -name '*.gradle*' | \
sort | xargs cat > /tmp/CIRCLECI_CACHE_KEY
- restore_cache:
key: cache-{{ checksum "/tmp/CIRCLECI_CACHE_KEY" }}
- run:
name: Run Tests in << parameters.timezone >>
command: ./gradlew test --info
- store_test_results:
path: build/test-results
- save_cache:
key: cache-{{ checksum "/tmp/CIRCLECI_CACHE_KEY" }}
paths:
- ~/.gradle/caches
- store_artifacts:
path: build/reports
workflows:
test-across-timezones:
jobs:
- test:
matrix:
parameters:
timezone: [Asia/Singapore, Asia/Riyadh, Asia/Tokyo, Europe/London, Europe/Paris, America/New_York]
- 3. Test across time zones
And that’s it! You’ve just converted a basic CI job into a flexible, parallel, time zone-aware matrix build.
Push your changes to GitHub. Go to the CircleCI dashboard to review.
It worked!
Let’s review one time zone: Europe/London.
For the report details, click the Artifact tab. Then, open the build/reports/tests/test/coupon-timezone-report.html
file.
To summarize, here are the report results for all time zones:
Timezone: Europe/Paris
| # | Input Local Time | UTC Time | Deadline UTC | Valid? | |—-|————————–|—————————-|—————————-|————–| | 1 | 2025-04-15T00:00:00 | 2025-04-14T22:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 2 | 2025-04-16T22:00:00 | 2025-04-16T20:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 3 | 2025-04-17T00:59:59 | 2025-04-16T22:59:59Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 4 | 2025-04-16T18:59:59 | 2025-04-16T16:59:59Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 5 | 2025-04-17T00:00:01 | 2025-04-16T22:00:01Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 6 | 2025-04-16T17:00:00 | 2025-04-16T15:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 7 | 2025-04-17T02:00:00 | 2025-04-17T00:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ❌ false | | 8 | 2025-04-16T13:00:00 | 2025-04-16T11:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true |
Timezone: Europe/London
| # | Input Local Time | UTC Time | Deadline UTC | Valid? | |—-|————————–|—————————-|—————————-|————–| | 1 | 2025-04-15T00:00:00 | 2025-04-14T23:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 2 | 2025-04-16T22:00:00 | 2025-04-16T21:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 3 | 2025-04-17T00:59:59 | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 4 | 2025-04-16T18:59:59 | 2025-04-16T17:59:59Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 5 | 2025-04-17T00:00:01 | 2025-04-16T23:00:01Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 6 | 2025-04-16T17:00:00 | 2025-04-16T16:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 7 | 2025-04-17T02:00:00 | 2025-04-17T01:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ❌ false | | 8 | 2025-04-16T13:00:00 | 2025-04-16T12:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true |
Timezone: Asia/Tokyo
| # | Input Local Time | UTC Time | Deadline UTC | Valid? | |—-|————————–|—————————-|—————————-|————–| | 1 | 2025-04-15T00:00:00 | 2025-04-14T15:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 2 | 2025-04-16T22:00:00 | 2025-04-16T13:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 3 | 2025-04-17T00:59:59 | 2025-04-16T15:59:59Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 4 | 2025-04-16T18:59:59 | 2025-04-16T09:59:59Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 5 | 2025-04-17T00:00:01 | 2025-04-16T15:00:01Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 6 | 2025-04-16T17:00:00 | 2025-04-16T08:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 7 | 2025-04-17T02:00:00 | 2025-04-16T17:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 8 | 2025-04-16T13:00:00 | 2025-04-16T04:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true |
Timezone: Asia/Singapore
| # | Input Local Time | UTC Time | Deadline UTC | Valid? | |—-|————————–|—————————-|—————————-|————–| | 1 | 2025-04-15T00:00:00 | 2025-04-14T16:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 2 | 2025-04-16T22:00:00 | 2025-04-16T14:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 3 | 2025-04-17T00:59:59 | 2025-04-16T16:59:59Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 4 | 2025-04-16T18:59:59 | 2025-04-16T10:59:59Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 5 | 2025-04-17T00:00:01 | 2025-04-16T16:00:01Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 6 | 2025-04-16T17:00:00 | 2025-04-16T09:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 7 | 2025-04-17T02:00:00 | 2025-04-16T18:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 8 | 2025-04-16T13:00:00 | 2025-04-16T05:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true |
Timezone: Asia/Riyadh
| # | Input Local Time | UTC Time | Deadline UTC | Valid? | |—-|————————–|—————————-|—————————-|————–| | 1 | 2025-04-15T00:00:00 | 2025-04-14T21:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 2 | 2025-04-16T22:00:00 | 2025-04-16T19:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 3 | 2025-04-17T00:59:59 | 2025-04-16T21:59:59Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 4 | 2025-04-16T18:59:59 | 2025-04-16T15:59:59Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 5 | 2025-04-17T00:00:01 | 2025-04-16T21:00:01Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 6 | 2025-04-16T17:00:00 | 2025-04-16T14:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 7 | 2025-04-17T02:00:00 | 2025-04-16T23:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 8 | 2025-04-16T13:00:00 | 2025-04-16T10:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true |
Timezone: America/New_York
| # | Input Local Time | UTC Time | Deadline UTC | Valid? | |—-|————————–|—————————-|—————————-|————–| | 1 | 2025-04-15T00:00:00 | 2025-04-15T04:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 2 | 2025-04-16T22:00:00 | 2025-04-17T02:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ❌ false | | 3 | 2025-04-17T00:59:59 | 2025-04-17T04:59:59Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ❌ false | | 4 | 2025-04-16T18:59:59 | 2025-04-16T22:59:59Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 5 | 2025-04-17T00:00:01 | 2025-04-17T04:00:01Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ❌ false | | 6 | 2025-04-16T17:00:00 | 2025-04-16T21:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true | | 7 | 2025-04-17T02:00:00 | 2025-04-17T06:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ❌ false | | 8 | 2025-04-16T13:00:00 | 2025-04-16T17:00Z[UTC] | 2025-04-16T23:59:59Z[UTC] | ✅ true |
The results confirm that UTC-based deadline validation works well in most time zones, except for America/New_York, where some inputs end up past the deadline because of the time difference.
Using CircleCI’s matrix build made testing across multiple time zones much easier—we could quickly spot time zone-specific edge cases without extra hassle. This approach really helps in catching time-related inconsistencies more efficiently across different regions.
Conclusion
Dealing with time zone logic in global software is like chasing shadows; subtle, frustrating, and often impossible to reproduce. But with CircleCI’s build matrix, you no longer have to guess how your app behaves worldwide.
With just a few configuration lines, you can transform an ordinary test pipeline into a powerful simulation engine that runs in parallel across time zones—from Tokyo to New York. No need for manual tricks or hardcoded offsets.
CircleCI doesn’t just run tests, it turns your CI pipeline into a time machine:
- It uses the
TZ
environment variable to realistically simulate different system time zones. - It helps uncover elusive, time zone-related bugs that would go unnoticed in local environments.
- It runs everything in parallel, drastically reducing feedback time.
The build matrix is CircleCI’s secret weapon for handling time-based logic: elegant, efficient, and incredibly scalable. With it, you can confidently ensure that your time-sensitive features behave with atomic precision no matter where your users are.
The complete code for this project is available on GitHub.